[Users] 6.4 CR: oVirt 3.1 breaks with missing cpu features after update to CentOS 6.4 (6.3 + CR)
Patrick Hurrelmann
patrick.hurrelmann at lobster.de
Tue Mar 5 04:21:16 EST 2013
On 04.03.2013 21:52, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 19:03, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I tested the upcoming CentOS 6.4 release with my lab installation of
>> oVirt 3.1 and it fails to play well.
>>
>> Background: freshly installed CentOS 6.3 host in a Nehalem CPU-type
>> Cluster with 2 other hosts. Storage is iSCSI. Datacenter and Cluster are
>> both version 3.1. oVirt 3.1 was installed via Dreyou's repo.
>>
>> In CentOS 6.3 all is fine and the following rpms are installed:
>>
>> libvirt.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.8
>> libvirt-client.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.8
>> libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.8
>> libvirt-python.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.8
>> vdsm.x86_64 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-cli.noarch 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-python.x86_64 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-xmlrpc.noarch 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> qemu-kvm.x86_64 2:0.12.1.2-2.295.el6_3.10
>>
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux vh-test1.mydomain.com 2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6
>> 03:10:46 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> virsh cpu capabilities on 6.3:
>> <cpu>
>> <arch>x86_64</arch>
>> <model>Nehalem</model>
>> <vendor>Intel</vendor>
>> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/>
>> <feature name='rdtscp'/>
>> <feature name='pdcm'/>
>> <feature name='xtpr'/>
>> <feature name='tm2'/>
>> <feature name='est'/>
>> <feature name='smx'/>
>> <feature name='vmx'/>
>> <feature name='ds_cpl'/>
>> <feature name='monitor'/>
>> <feature name='dtes64'/>
>> <feature name='pbe'/>
>> <feature name='tm'/>
>> <feature name='ht'/>
>> <feature name='ss'/>
>> <feature name='acpi'/>
>> <feature name='ds'/>
>> <feature name='vme'/>
>> </cpu>
>>
>> and corresponding cpu features from vdsClient:
>>
>> cpuCores = 4
>> cpuFlags = fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,mtrr,pge,mca,
>> cmov,pat,pse36,clflush,dts,acpi,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2,ss,ht,
>> tm,pbe,syscall,nx,rdtscp,lm,constant_tsc,arch_perfmon,
>> pebs,bts,rep_good,xtopology,nonstop_tsc,aperfmperf,pni,
>> dtes64,monitor,ds_cpl,vmx,smx,est,tm2,ssse3,cx16,xtpr,
>> pdcm,sse4_1,sse4_2,popcnt,lahf_lm,ida,dts,tpr_shadow,vnmi,
>> flexpriority,ept,vpid,model_Conroe,model_Penryn,
>> model_Nehalem
>> cpuModel = Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz
>> cpuSockets = 1
>> cpuSpeed = 2394.132
>>
>>
>> So the system was updated to 6.4 using the continuous release repo.
>>
>> Installed rpms after update to 6.4 (6.3 + CR):
>>
>> libvirt.x86_64 0.10.2-18.el6
>> libvirt-client.x86_64 0.10.2-18.el6
>> libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 0.10.2-18.el6
>> libvirt-python.x86_64 0.10.2-18.el6
>> vdsm.x86_64 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-cli.noarch 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-python.x86_64 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> vdsm-xmlrpc.noarch 4.10.0-0.46.15.el6
>> qemu-kvm.x86_64 2:0.12.1.2-2.355.el6_4_4.1
>>
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux vh-test1.mydomain.com 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 27
>> 06:06:45 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> virsh capabilities on 6.4:
>> <cpu>
>> <arch>x86_64</arch>
>> <model>Nehalem</model>
>> <vendor>Intel</vendor>
>> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/>
>> <feature name='rdtscp'/>
>> <feature name='pdcm'/>
>> <feature name='xtpr'/>
>> <feature name='tm2'/>
>> <feature name='est'/>
>> <feature name='smx'/>
>> <feature name='vmx'/>
>> <feature name='ds_cpl'/>
>> <feature name='monitor'/>
>> <feature name='dtes64'/>
>> <feature name='pbe'/>
>> <feature name='tm'/>
>> <feature name='ht'/>
>> <feature name='ss'/>
>> <feature name='acpi'/>
>> <feature name='ds'/>
>> <feature name='vme'/>
>> </cpu>
>>
>> and corresponding cpu features from vdsClient:
>>
>> cpuCores = 4
>> cpuFlags = fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,sep,mtrr,pge,mca,
>> cmov,pat,pse36,clflush,dts,acpi,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2,ss,ht,
>> tm,pbe,syscall,nx,rdtscp,lm,constant_tsc,arch_perfmon,
>> pebs,bts,rep_good,xtopology,nonstop_tsc,aperfmperf,pni,
>> dtes64,monitor,ds_cpl,vmx,smx,est,tm2,ssse3,cx16,xtpr,
>> pdcm,sse4_1,sse4_2,popcnt,lahf_lm,ida,dts,tpr_shadow,vnmi,
>> flexpriority,ept,vpid,model_coreduo,model_Conroe
>> cpuModel = Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz
>> cpuSockets = 1
>> cpuSpeed = 2394.098
>>
>> Full outputs of virsh capabilities and vdsCaps are attached. The only
>> difference I can see is that 6.4 exposes one additional cpu flags (sep)
>> and this seems to break the cpu recognition of vdsm.
>>
>> Anyone has some hints on how to resolve or debug this further? What more
>> information can I provide to help?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> seems like a vdsm issue - can you check if you have this patch (not sure
> its related):
>
> commit 558994f8ffe030acd1b851dfd074f3417681337b
> Author: Mark Wu <wudxw at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 9 11:18:10 2012 +0800
>
> Fix a bug in the naming convertion of cpu feature 'sse4_x'
>
> The list slice opertion missed the last character. It caused
> the feature name couldn't get chance to be converted into
> libvirt's naming.
>
> Change-Id: Ia241b09c96fa16441ba9421f61a2f9a417f0d978
> Signed-off-by: Mark Wu <wudxw at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8413
> Reviewed-by: Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek at redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/vdsm/libvirtvm.py b/vdsm/libvirtvm.py
> index 64a3b6b..bd43b56 100644
> --- a/vdsm/libvirtvm.py
> +++ b/vdsm/libvirtvm.py
> @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ class _DomXML:
>
> for feature in features[1:]:
> # convert Linux name of feature to libvirt
> - if feature[1:5] == 'sse4_':
> + if feature[1:6] == 'sse4_':
> feature = feature[0] + 'sse4.' + feature[6:]
>
> f = self.doc.createElement('feature')
>
My version of vdsm as stated by Dreyou:
v 4.10.0-0.46 (.15), builded from
b59c8430b2a511bcea3bc1a954eee4ca1c0f4861 (branch ovirt-3.1)
I can't see that Ia241b09c96fa16441ba9421f61a2f9a417f0d978 was merged to
3.1 Branch?
I applied that patch locally and restarted vdsmd but this does not
change anything. Supported cpu is still as low as Conroe instead of
Nehalem. Or is there more to do than patching libvirtvm.py?
Regards
Patrick
--
Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg
HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich
More information about the Users
mailing list