[Users] compatibility rhev-m (regged, valid entitlement) + ovirt rhev-h for lab part
squadra at gmail.com
Fri Nov 1 00:36:28 UTC 2013
yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect to
break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd
management node, based on ovirt is also overkill.
lets see if its killing my pets
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote:
>> i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h
>> nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable
>> to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems
>> which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live deploy of our
>> so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images and
>> rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work?
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
> rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev versions
> are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or backported to
> I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together.
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users