[Users] compatibility rhev-m (regged, valid entitlement) + ovirt rhev-h for lab part

[squadra]

Hi Itamar,

yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect to
break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd
management node, based on ovirt is also overkill.

lets see if its killing my pets

cheers,




On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h
>> nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable
>> to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems
>> which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live deploy of our
>> stuff.
>>
>> so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images and
>> rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> juergen
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
> rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev versions
> are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or backported to
> rhev.
> I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together.
>



-- 

Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131101/da9b9610/attachment-0001.html>