[Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or Regression

[Sander Grendelman]

I did not run into this problem at all ( neither on my cos6.4 nor on
my 6.5 hosts ).
The "virtual-host" profile was chosen automatically, installation of
vdsm was literally
as simple as adding the following lines in the %post section of my
kickstart file:

rpm -ivh http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm
rpm -ivh http://mirror.1000mbps.com/fedora-epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm

yum -y update epel-release
yum -y install vdsm



On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Ted Miller <tmiller at hcjb.org> wrote:
> I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
>
> One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use.  At the
> time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error.  It is now just a warning,
> so it does not prevent installing a host.  But, as a warning, a lot of
> people are probably missing it.
>
> When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a
> "rhs-virtualization" profile.  That profile is not included in Centos.  I
> substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
>
> I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293,
> where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV +
> RHS.  I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV +
> RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
>
> My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses
> "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls
> back to "virtual-host".  (I don't know what (if any) differences there are
> between the two profiles.)
>
> Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
>
> Ted Miller
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>