[ovirt-users] separate ovirtmgmt from glusterfs traffic

[Punit Dambiwal]

Hi Demeter,

Yes...I already asked the same question before 2 months....they suggest me
the workaround (
http://www.ovirt.org/oVirt_Wiki:How_to_change_Gluster%27s_network_interface)
but after workaround still it's same...even no improvement in the Ovirt
3.5...

It's very hard to go in the production without separate storage
network....may be someone from redhat can help...

Thanks,
Punit



On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Demeter Tibor <tdemeter at itsmart.hu> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I think is a really good question, why does not possible sepereate storage
> network traffic like display, etc?
> This is not an easy task to set up, and it's more difficult on a live
> system.
>
> Tibor
>
>
> ----- Eredeti üzenet -----
> > On 18/11/14 06:25, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In my experience, having ovirt traffic on the same nic that gluster
> > > can make your platafrom unstable. I was using it for large file
> > > storage and gluster has so big traffic that ovirt got confused and
> > > started marking hosts as unavailable because of hi latency.
> > > I've opened an RFE over a year ago, but had no luck with the team to
> > > get it done. In the RFE I was asking to have a way in the UI to decide
> > > which nic to use for gluster other than the MGMT net that is the one
> > > ovirt lets you use.
> > > There's another way to do this and it's from outside ovirt. There you
> > > have to unregister and re register the bricks using gluster console
> > > commands. This way, when you register the bricks, you can specify the
> > > IP address of the spare NIC and then the traffic will not interfere
> > > with the mgmt.
> > > There's a step that I don't recall much, but ovirt is going to need to
> > > know that the bricks are no longer is the mgmt IP, maybe someone else
> > > in the list can help with this. I can tell you that if you search the
> > > list you'll see my posts about this and the replys of those who helped
> > > my back then.
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I think that the possibility to add a separate storage network is a
> > must. It doesn't make sense Gluster support if you can't separate
> > management network traffic of storage network traffic. In 3.5 you can
> > define management/vm/display/migration interfaces but not storage
> > interfaces.  Why? I don't know. But I think that Gluster support is
> > incomplete without exclusive storage networking.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Federico
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141119/eb60b6bf/attachment-0001.html>