[ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT

[Phil Daws]

Hi Antoni:

Yes, prior to the reboot it did work okay.  This is how it should look I believe:

    Bridge "ovirtmgmt"
        Port "mgmt0"
            Interface "mgmt0"
                type: internal
        Port "ovsbr0"
            Interface "ovsbr0"
                type: internal

So the bridge would be defined by oVirt then I guess with a custom hook that would then be added to the OVS stack ?

Thanks, Phil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap at redhat.com>
To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod at splatnix.net>
Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>, users at ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 9:56:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod at splatnix.net>
> To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>, users at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:37:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> 
> That is what I tried but oVirt appears to overwrite the bridge information on
> boot :( Thanks, Phil

But before rebooting, does it work as you intended? If so, you could just make
a vdsm hook that adds ovirtmgmt to the ovs bridge after it is set up. (I could
give more directions into how to do it).

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap at redhat.com>
> To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod at splatnix.net>
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>, users at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 8:00:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod at splatnix.net>
> > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> > Cc: users at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 5:02:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> > 
> > Hmmm, this is becoming difficult ..
> > 
> > I have added into the engine the custom hook and understand how that will
> > work.  The issue is how can a single NIC use two different bridges ?
> > Example with OVS would be that one requires:
> > 
> > em1 -+ ovirtmgmt (bridge) -> management IP (public)
> >      + ovs       (bridge) -> firewall IP (public)
> >                                 |
> >                                 + vlan 1
> >                                 + vlan 2
> > 
> > this works fine when using OVS and KVM, without oVirt, so there must be a
> > way
> > to hook the two together without a Neutron appliance.
> > 
> > Any thoughts ? Thanks, Phil.
> 
> I haven't tried this, and it may not work, but what happens if you add the
> ovirtmgmt
> bridge as a port of the ovs bridge?
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> > To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod at splatnix.net>
> > Cc: users at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 22 October, 2014 3:54:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:12:09PM +0100, Phil Daws wrote:
> > > Thanks Dan & Antoni:
> > > 
> > > I wonder then if I could replace the standard libvirt defined network
> > > with
> > > an OpenVSwitch one like I have on my dev system?  That is just straight
> > > KVM with OVS integrated.  Maybe a bit more overhead in administration but
> > > possibly less than having to spin up a Neutron Appliance.
> > 
> > Once you start to use the vdsm-hook-extnet, all that you need to do is
> > to replace the libvirt-side definition of the "external network". This
> > may well be an OpenVSwitch-based network e.g.
> > http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementVlanTag
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
>