[ovirt-users] Using both shared and local storage
Jiri Belka
jbelka at redhat.com
Mon Aug 31 06:38:54 EDT 2015
> No, it doesn't work as expected. I would expect to have an option to attach
> to any Virtual Machine storage which is either shared or local.
It does work as expected, do your homework first to know how oVirt does
work. Your expectation are just your expectations.
Question: How would you migrate a VM in a cluster with local storage?
Wouldn't glusterfs solve the issue? It can use those SSDs... (Not expert
in glusters here...).
j.
> For example, I have database server so I could put on shared storage and
> use local, SSD disk for data. I don't care if system is on "slow" network
> storage but with a lot of space and in the same time, I can use limited,
> but fast SSD space for data only.
>
> So, is this possible or not?
>
> [...]
> > > Currently at the company, we are testing oVirt 3.5 as a cloud platform.
> > > We have 4 nodes and GlusterFS as a shared storage.
> > > Every node has another SSD disk, currently not used. What we would like
> > is to
> > > attach that local storage to particular host, so that some virtual
> > machines
> > > can be on local and some on shared storage.
> > > If I try to create local storage, it works, but then host is in separate
> > Data
> > > Center.
> > > If I try to add POSIX FS to node in existing Data Center, then all other
> > > hosts stop working, since they can't access that local storage (kind of
> > > expected).
> > >
> > > So, long story short - does shared and local storage mix and how?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much!
> >
> > Works as expected, doesn't it? What do you want to exactly achieve
> > with local storage?
More information about the Users
mailing list