[ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] [ANN] oVirt 3.5.2 First Release Candidate is now available for testing

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:48:22PM -0500, Nir Soffer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer at redhat.com>
> > To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> > Cc: announce at ovirt.org, Users at ovirt.org, devel at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 10:35:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] [ANN] oVirt 3.5.2 First Release	Candidate is now	available for testing
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> > > To: announce at ovirt.org, devel at ovirt.org, Users at ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:00:10 PM
> > > Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ANN] oVirt 3.5.2 First Release Candidate is now
> > > 	available for testing
> > > 
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > > 
> > > The oVirt team is pleased to announce that the 3.5.2 First Release
> > > Candidate
> > > is now
> > > available for testing as of Feb 27th 2015.
> > > 
> > > The release candidate is available now for Fedora 20...
> > 
> > Do we support Fedora 21?

I don't recall a formal statement about it, but I surely WANT to support
it, as nowadays it is the run-of-the-mill Fedora version.

> 
> May be also relevant for Fedora 20 with virt-preview repository.
> 
> Note also that we cannot use libvirt 1.2.8 on Fedora 20, since it contains
> critical bug that breaks live storage migration. This bug was fixed in 
> libvirt 1.2.9.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1176673
> 
> Summary:
> - Fedora 20 is ok since it uses libvirt 1.1.3.
> - Fefora 20 with virt-preview must provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 and vdsm must
>   include the patch bellow
> - Fedora 21 provides libvirt 1.2.9 and vdsm must include the patch bellow.
> 
> These requirement are not enforced in vdsm spec yet.
> 
> > 
> > If we do, then this fix _must_ be included in 3.5.2:
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/38201 vm: Fix LSM when using libvirt >= 1.2.8

Please mark the relevant bug as a blocker of the 3.5.2 tracker. That
would make sure we don't release without it.