[ovirt-users] Request for feedback on your db vacuum status

Baptiste Agasse baptiste.agasse at lyra-network.com
Thu Dec 8 15:01:13 UTC 2016


----- Le 8 Déc 16, à 15:18, Roy Golan <rgolan at redhat.com> a écrit : 

> Hi all,

> Following the thread about vacuum tool [1] I would like to gather some feedback
> about your deployment's db vacuum status The info is completely anonymous and
> function running it is a read only reporting one and should have little or no
> effect on the db.

> The result can be pretty verbose but again will not disclose sensitive info.
> Anyway review it before pasting it. It should look something like that(a
> snippet of one table):

> INFO: vacuuming "pg_catalog.pg_ts_template"
> INFO: index "pg_ts_template_tmplname_index" now contains 5 row versions in 2
> pages
> DETAIL: 0 index row versions were removed.
> 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.

> 1. sudo su - postgres -c "psql engine -c 'vacuum verbose'" &> /tmp/vacuum.log

> 2. review the /tmp/vacuum.log

> 3. paste it to http://paste.fedoraproject.org/ and reply with the link here

> [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2016-December/014484.html

> Thanks,
> Roy

> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

http://paste.fedoraproject.org/501769/48120789/ 

But, we run a full vacuum about one month ago that have free about 8GB of space and we set DWH_SAMPLING=60 to decrease data size of DWH (install is ~ 1y and half old, updated from 3.5 to 3.6 to 4.0). 

Have a nice day. 

Regards. 

-- 
Baptiste 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161208/96b077ef/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list