[ovirt-users] Affinity/HA for a set of VMs

TranceWorldLogic . tranceworldlogic at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 09:02:41 UTC 2016


Hi Doron,

Yes, I am referring to storage level fencing like drbd/pacemaker tool.

Thanks,
~Rohit


On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Doron Fediuck <dfediuck at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:02 AM, TranceWorldLogic .
>> <tranceworldlogic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was trying to explore more about fencing option supported in ovirt.
>> > But getting lost in documents.
>> >
>> > My requirement is to fence at VM level rather than host level.
>>
>> I am pretty certain that this is not called fencing. Fencing is for hosts.
>> And it's meant for _stopping_ them, not starting.
>>
>> > e.g let assume VM1.1, VM1.2,VM1.3 are running on host1 and VM2.1,VM2.2
>> VM2.3
>> > running on host2. Suppose due to some error only VM1.1 goes down [Note:
>> > VM1.2 and VM1.3 in running state] then VM2.1 must come up.
>> >
>> > Can I get to know whether such functionality is supported by ovirt ?
>> > If yes, would you please explain also how it work
>> >           or would you share refernece for me to refer and understand
>> it ?
>> > if yes, is it configurable by python sdk ?
>>
>> No idea, but it might be possible using affinity rules and/or HA.
>> Changing the subject, to try to attract more relevant responses,
>> and adding Tomer.
>>
>> Best,
>> --
>> Didi
>>
>>
>>
> Hi,
> are you referring to storage based fencing?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161214/a958d0b9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list