[ovirt-users] Local storage & shared in same cluster

[Sebastian Greco]

Maybe I missread, sorry. I interpreted that by design this was not a
feature and that it was not in any roadmap as current customers don't need
it, or at least I understood that from previous posts.

Happy to know this is planned to be a feature! :)

Again guys, thanks a lot for the help!


Sebastián Greco
IT Consultant
Cloud Computing - Red Hat - VMware - Zimbra
www.essiprojects.com
*www.essiprojects.co.uk <http://www.essiprojects.co.uk>*

Pl. Prim, 4-5 Pral 2a · T:+34 977 221 182 · M: +34 619 985 161 F: +34 977
230 170 · 43001 Tarragona Spain
120 Pall Mall · T:+44 207 101 0778 · F: +44 843 538 3112 · SW1Y 5ED *London*
 UK

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco
> <sgreco at essiprojects.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> VMs are not
> >> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
> >
> >
> > Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from
> RH
> > points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I
> can't
> > argue with that, what I do can say is that "non-customers" (most of
> > companies out there using vsphere or hyper-v) feel dissapointed towards
> this
> > solution for things like this one (for this case, 2 of my customers are
> > missing this, we are deploying RHV to one of them this week).
> >
> > I don't see how this lack of flexibility is something good, and so far
> from
> > my experience with customers which I'm trying to convince to start using
> > RHV, when they finally do agree to start with one or two servers
> (following
> > the RHCI roadmap evolution to the hybrid cloud), they see things like
> this
> > and dismiss this solution sooner than later.
> >
> > Anyways, question has been answer "yes, is technically possible but by
> > design it is not going to happen",
>
> Not sure how you got this impression from current discussion. On the
> contrary - people are working on this, and it was planned to be completed
> in 4.0, but eventually postponed.
>
> Best,
>
> > and I wouldn't like to convert this
> > thread or abuse your kindness deviating the subject :)
> >
> > Thx again guys for the help,
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Didi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161031/d0bf79f1/attachment-0001.html>