[ovirt-users] storage redundancy in Ovirt
FERNANDO FREDIANI
fernando.frediani at upx.com
Sat Apr 15 17:37:49 UTC 2017
Hello Konstantin.
That doesn`t make much sense make a whole cluster depend on a single host.
>From what I know any host talk directly to NFS Storage Array or whatever
other Shared Storage you have.
Have you tested that host going down if that affects the other with the NFS
mounted directlly in a NFS Storage array ?
Fernando
2017-04-15 12:42 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko at gmail.com>:
> In ovirt you have to attach storage through specific host.
> If host goes down storage is not available.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI <
> fernando.frediani at upx.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, make it not go through host1 and dedicate a storage server for
>> running NFS and make both hosts connect to it.
>> In my view NFS is much easier to manage than any other type of storage,
>> specially FC and iSCSI and performance is pretty much the same, so you
>> won`t get better results other than management going to other type.
>>
>> Fernando
>>
>> 2017-04-15 5:25 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I have one nfs storage,
>>> it's connected through host1.
>>> host2 also has access to it, I can easily migrate vms between them.
>>>
>>> The question is - if host1 is down - all infrastructure is down, since
>>> all traffic goes through host1,
>>> is there any way in oVirt to use redundant storage?
>>>
>>> Only glusterfs?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170415/bd14be48/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list