[ovirt-users] oVirt Node 4.1.2 offering RC update?

[Vinícius Ferrão]

May I ask another question?

I’ve noted two new ISO images of 4.1.3 Node version over here: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1/iso/ovirt-node-ng-installer-ovirt/

Which one is the stable version:
4.1-2017070915
4.1-2017070913

Thanks,
V.

On 9 Jul 2017, at 13:26, Lev Veyde <lveyde at redhat.com<mailto:lveyde at redhat.com>> wrote:

Hi Vinicius,

It's actually due to my mistake, and as result the package got tagged with the RC version instead of the GA.
The package itself was based on the 4.1.3 code, though.
I rebuilt it and published a fixed package, so the issue should be resolved now.

Thanks in advance,

On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Vinícius Ferrão <ferrao at if.ufrj.br<mailto:ferrao at if.ufrj.br>> wrote:
Hello,

I’ve noted a strange thing on oVirt. On the Hosted Engine an update was offered and I was a bit confused, since I’m running the latest oVirt Node release.

To check if 4.1.3 was already released I issued an “yum update” on the command line and for my surprise an RC release was offered. This not seems to be right:

======================================================================================================================
 Package                        Arch       Version                                                Repository     Size
======================================================================================================================
Installing:
 ovirt-node-ng-image-update     noarch     4.1.3-0.3.rc3.20170622082156.git47b4302.el7.centos     ovirt-4.1     544 M
     replacing  ovirt-node-ng-image-update-placeholder.noarch 4.1.2-1.el7.centos
Updating:
 ovirt-engine-appliance         noarch     4.1-20170622.1.el7.centos                              ovirt-4.1     967 M

Transaction Summary
======================================================================================================================
Install  1 Package
Upgrade  1 Package

Total download size: 1.5 G
Is this ok [y/d/N]: N

Is this normal behavior? This isn’t really good, since it can lead to stable to unstable moves on production. If this is normal, how can we avoid it?

Thanks,
V.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org<mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



--

Lev Veyde

Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP

Red Hat Israel

<https://www.redhat.com/>

lev at redhat.com<mailto:lev at redhat.com> | lveyde at redhat.com<mailto:lveyde at redhat.com>

[https://www.redhat.com/profiles/rh/themes/redhatdotcom/img/logo-red-hat-black.png]<https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.<https://redhat.com/trusted>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170710/8d58ff64/attachment-0001.html>