[ovirt-users] Bizzare oVirt network problem
FERNANDO FREDIANI
fernando.frediani at upx.com
Wed Jul 12 20:10:48 UTC 2017
Hello Pavel
What you mean by another oVirt instance ? In one Datacenter it has 2
different clusters (or Datacenter in oVirt way of orrganizing things),
but in the other Datacenter the oVirt Node is standlone.
Let me know.
Fernando
On 12/07/2017 16:49, Pavel Gashev wrote:
>
> Fernando,
>
> It looks like you have another oVirt instance in the same network
> segment(s). Don’t you?
>
> *From: *<users-bounces at ovirt.org> on behalf of FERNANDO FREDIANI
> <fernando.frediani at upx.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 16:21
> *To: *"users at ovirt.org" <users at ovirt.org>
> *Subject: *[ovirt-users] Bizzare oVirt network problem
>
> Hello.
>
> I am facing a pretty bizzare problem in two of my Nodes running oVirt.
> A given VM running a few hundred Mbps of traffic simply stops passing
> traffic and only recovers after a reboot. Checking the bridge with
> 'brctl showmacs BRIDGE' I see the VM's MAC address missing during this
> event.
>
> It seems the bridge simply unlearn the VM's mac address which only
> returns when the VM is rebooted.
> This problems happened in two different Nodes running in different
> hardware, in different datacenter, in different network architecture,
> different switch vendors and different bonding modes.
>
> The main differences these Nodes have compared to others I have and
> which don't show this problem are:
> - The CentOS 7 installed is a Minimal installation instead of oVirt-NG
> - The Kernel used is 4.12 (elrepo) instead of the default 3.10
> - The ovirtmgmt network is used also for the Virtual Machine
> showing this problem.
>
> Has anyone have any idea if it may have anything to do with oVirt (any
> filters) or any of the components different from a oVirt-NG installation ?
>
> Thanks
> Fernando
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170712/4767d284/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list