[ovirt-users] Unable to add storage domains to Node Hosted Engine
Yaniv Kaul
ykaul at redhat.com
Tue May 30 06:31:46 UTC 2017
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Andy Gibbs <andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 29 May 2017 08:22, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Hi, so if I understood correctly, you're trying to work on a single host
> > deployment right?
> > Or are you just trying to replace the bare metal all-in-one 3.6 in a
> context
> > with more hosts?
> > If this is the case, can you share your use case? I'm asking because for
> > single host installations there are other solutions that may fit better
> than
> > oVirt, like virt-manager or kimchi (https://github.com/kimchi-
> project/kimchi)
>
> Sandro, thank you for your reply.
>
> I hadn't heard about kimchi before. Virt-manager had been discounted as
> the user interface is not really friendly enough for non-technical people,
> which is important for us. The simple web interface with oVirt, however,
> is excellent in this regard.
>
> I would say that the primary use-case is this: We want a server which
> individual employees can log into (using their active directory logins),
> access company-wide "public" VMs or create their own private VMs for their
> own use (if permitted). Users should be able to start and stop the
> "public" VMs but not be able to edit or delete them. They should only have
> full control over the VMs that they create for themselves. And very
> importantly, it should be possible to say which users have the ability to
> create their own VMs. Nice to have would be the ability for users to be
> able to share their VMs with other users. Really nice to have would be a
> way of detecting whether VMs are in use by someone else before opening a
> console and stealing it away from the current user! (Actually, case in
> point, the user web interface for oVirt 3.6 always starts a console for a
> VM when the user logs in, if it is the only one running on the server and
> which the user has access to. I don't know i
> f this is fixed in 4.1, but our work-around is to have a dummy VM that
> always runs and displays a graphic with helpful text for any that see it!
> Bit of a nuisance, but not too bad. We never found a way to disable this
> behaviour.)
>
This sounds like a bug to me, if guest agent is installed and running on
the guest.
I'd appreciate if you could open a bug with all relevant details.
> We started off some years ago with a server running oVirt 3.4, now running
> 3.6, with the all-in-one plugin and had good success with this. The hosted
> engine for oVirt 4.1 seemed to be the recommended "upgrade path" --
> although we did also start with entirely new server hardware.
>
> Ultimately once this first server is set up we will want to convert the
> old server hardware to a second node so that we can balance the load (we
> have a number of very resource-hungry VMs). This would be our secondary
> use-case. More nodes may follow in future. However, we don't see the
> particular need to have VMs that migrate from node to node, and each node
> will most likely have its own storage domains for the VMs that run on it.
> But to have one central web interface for managing the whole lot is a huge
> advantage.
>
> Coming then to the storage issue that comes up in my original post, we are
> trying to install this first server platform, keeping the node, the hosted
> engine, and the storage all on one physical machine. We don't (currently)
> want to set up a separate storage server, and don't really see the benefit
> of doing so. Since my first email, I've actually succeeded in getting the
> engine to recognise the node's storage paths. However, I'm not sure it
> really is the right way. The solution I found was to create a third path,
> /srv/ovirt/engine, in addition to the data and iso paths. The engine gets
> installed to /srv/ovirt/engine and then once the engine is started up, I
> create a new data domain at node:/srv/ovirt/data. This then adds the new
> path as the master data domain, and then after thinking a bit to itself,
> suddenly the hosted_storage data domain appears, and after a bit more
> thinking, everything seems to get properly registered and works. I can
> then also create the ISO storag
> e domain.
>
> Does this seem like a viable solution, or have I achieved something
> "illegal"?
>
Sounds a bit of a hack, but I don't see a good reason why it wouldn't work
- perhaps firewalling issues. Certainly not a common or tested scenario.
>
> I am still not having much luck with my other problem(s) to do with
> restarting the server: it still hangs on shutdown and it still takes a very
> long time (about ten minutes) after the node starts for the engine to
> start. Any help on this would be much appreciated.
>
Logs would be appreciated - engine.log, server.log, perhaps journal
entries. Perhaps there's race between NFS and Engine services?
Y.
>
> Thanks
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170530/e40c3a0c/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list