<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 14:39, Livnat Peer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpeer@redhat.com">lpeer@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 12/09/2011 08:58 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> I want to ask why is the ovirt-engine only available on 64bit platform<br>
> in the repo? I successfully run the jboss from the<br>
> repo and one compiled on a 32bit machine.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>I don't recall any specific reason to require a 64bit machine for the<br>
engine.<br>
The 64bit is needed for the hypervisor thus for supporting the single<br>
node use case (management + hypervisor on same machine).<br>
<br>
Livnat<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> For me it seems that this is a limitation: for small deployments, the<br>
> engine can be setup on an already running machine.<br>
> And that machine can be quite old, but it will cope with the engine very<br>
> well.<br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
> Cristian Falcas<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>So could it be moved to noarch and let vdsm on x64? Should I open a bug?<br><br>Best regards,<br></div>