<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Itamar Heim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iheim@redhat.com" target="_blank">iheim@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 09/22/2012 08:58 AM, Josh Logan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I'm currently setting up an ovirt cluster and so far it looks good. �I<br>
like the integration with Foreman <a href="http://theforeman.org/" target="_blank">http://theforeman.org/</a> .<br>
<br>
I would like to use Ceph / rbd for my storage. �I saw some mention of<br>
patches coming in May, but I did not find any new posts.<br>
<br>
What is the status of this work? �Is there some patches I can try out?<br>
I have a working Ceph cluster and a working ovirt cluster, I just need a<br>
way to bring them together.<br>
<br>
Thanks, JOSH<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
I don't remember any active work on this right now (for sure nothing like the gluster integration being done).<br>
but iiuc, ceph provides posixfs support - did you try creating a posixfs based storage domain?<br>
(you would need a "full" host (not ovirt-node) to install ceph client components on).<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
� �Itamar<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>I am doing my work on Fedora 17 hosts, not ovirt-node, since I know this will need more OS support.<br><br>There are a few different Ceph filesystems.� But the posix based one is the least ready for production.� The rbd filesystem is integrated into qemu and libvirt is the most suited for VM images.<br>
<br>Are the Gluster patches available?� I would like to see what that feature looks like and if I can modify them for Ceph.<br>If there is a better filesystem to investigate please let me know.<br><br>Thanks, JOSH<br><br>