<div dir="auto">I think he means SPM? I've seen when node with SPM goes down it isn't really seamless and takes a minute or two to catch up unless of course you out that node in maintenance mode but that isn't possible if it crashes or something</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 15, 2017 1:38 PM, "FERNANDO FREDIANI" <<a href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com">fernando.frediani@upx.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello Konstantin.<br><br></div>That doesn`t make much sense make a whole cluster depend on a single host. From what I know any host talk directly to NFS Storage Array or whatever other Shared Storage you have.<br></div>Have you tested that host going down if that affects the other with the NFS mounted directlly in a NFS Storage array ?<br><br></div>Fernando<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-04-15 12:42 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:konrasko@gmail.com" target="_blank">konrasko@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>In ovirt you have to attach storage through specific host. </div><div>If host goes down storage is not available. </div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI <<a href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com" target="_blank">fernando.frediani@upx.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div><div>Well, make it not go through host1 and dedicate a storage server for running NFS and make both hosts connect to it.<br></div>In my view NFS is much easier to manage than any other type of storage, specially FC and iSCSI and performance is pretty much the same, so you won`t get better results other than management going to other type.<br><br></div>Fernando<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2017-04-15 5:25 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <span><<a href="mailto:konrasko@gmail.com" target="_blank">konrasko@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hi guys,<div>I have one nfs storage,</div><div>it's connected through host1.</div><div>host2 also has access to it, I can easily migrate vms between them.</div><div><br></div><div>The question is - if host1 is down - all infrastructure is down, since all traffic goes through host1,</div><div>is there any way in oVirt to use redundant storage?</div><div><br></div><div>Only glusterfs?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div></div>
<br></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>