<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello Gianluca,<br><br></div>This should work as expected.<br></div>The only drawbacks that could be are loads on the link in case of heavy traffic. <br>If for example the VMs using most of the link's traffic it may affect the migration and vise-versa. <br><br></div>Cheers)<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com" target="_blank">gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div>I have a 10Gbit vlan defined as migration network and currently not enabled as vm network.</div><div>When you configure a host interface, assigning a vlan that is defined as migration network, you must assign an ip to it on the host.</div><div><br></div><div>Suppose I want to edit this vlan in DC so that I enable it to be also a VM network, are there any drawbacks having for example on a host the ip for this vlan (the migration ip) and also one or more running VMs with their vnics configured on this vlan too...?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance,</div><div>Gianluca</div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Michael Burman<br>RedHat Israel, RHV-M <span>Network </span>QE <br><br>Mobile: 054-5355725<br>IRC: mburman</div></div></div></div>
</div>