<div dir="auto"><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 26, 2018 7:52 PM, "Arman Khalatyan" <<a href="mailto:arm2arm@gmail.com">arm2arm@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">I believe about 50% overhead or even more...</div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Where are you getting these numbers from? </div><div dir="auto">We've seen much lower numbers.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">It is processor dependent, so newer are less affected as older CPUs. </div><div dir="auto">Also, keep in mimd that additional patches are expected that will bring back some of the performance. </div><div dir="auto">Y. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div class="elided-text"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">Am 26.01.2018 7:40 nachm. schrieb "Christopher Cox" <<a href="mailto:ccox@endlessnow.com" target="_blank">ccox@endlessnow.com</a>>:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Does it matter? This is just one of those required things. IMHO, most companies know there will be impact, and I would think they would accept any informational measurement after the fact.<br>
<br>
There are probably only a few cases where timing is so limited to where a skew would matter.<br>
<br>
Just saying...<br>
<br>
<br>
On 01/26/2018 11:48 AM, Jayme wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've been considering hyperconverged oVirt setup VS san/nas but I wonder how the meltdown patches have affected glusterFS performance since it is CPU intensive. Has anyone who has applied recent kernel updates noticed a performance drop with glusterFS?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>