Re: non-coding sub-projects
On 07/10/2012 01:54 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Infrastructure team began discussing seeking formal recognition as
a sub-project of oVirt.
However, the current methodology is clearly focused on code:
http://www.ovirt.org/governance/adding-a-subproject/
As such, I'm not even sure we know exactly what the Infra team is
asking for! At a minimum, I think the goal is to:
* Get 3+ maintainers in the project, then
* Get recognition as a formal project, and
* Maintainers join the Board to proactively drive infrastructure for
the entire project.
there is no connection between being a maintainer in a sub project and
joining the board.
we already have the non coding documentation project by stephen gordon,
though missing from that wiki i guess as an oversight
What think you all?
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v. gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP+2EK2ZIOBq0ODEERApEAAKCaLNWnwluKuLZ9YfqLx23Bo03+5ACeIKay
7uAqsUbsQg4xvL/Kji1bNb0=
=082m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board