On 09/28/2011 10:43 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/28/2011 08:49 AM, Michael D Day wrote:
board-bounces@ovirt.org wrote on 09/28/2011 05:44:56 AM:
my main concern is if this is going to be "the" policy engine for vdsm going forward, is if it shouldn't be established on something which is a rule based technology (say, pacemaker).
I think this is way too much speculation. I don't think anyone has proposed that MOM should be a general-purpose policy engine or that it should be "the" policy engine for VDSM.
I think the reason for the speculation is that we aren't being formal enough in our proposals. I think Fedora Features are a good model for making proposals like this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Proposals
I'll work on some ovirt wiki pages for a similar project inclusion template this afternoon.
From the board meeting call, we discussed creating a bit more structure to bring in new projects. Jim has volunteered to write this up for us and circulate.
In light of this, I'm going to suspend the vote, so we can get that drafted and reviewed on the board list. Then we will work with Adam to get that info written up and we and resume. Adman, thx for the working with us, mom is the first one with the full board assembled so you are helping us get the kinks out of the process and get it written down. This should hopefully resolve the concerns raised and allow us to not create a precedent that we don't want to follow for later project submissions. sound good? Carl.