Re: 3.5 Time-frame: pushing feature freeze

On 05/28/2014 06:01 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote: I think we should prioritize schedule over capacity. Features which do not make it to FF can wait for the next release. I think that we should be more careful in the planning phase because it seems to be a recurring phenomena where people commit for features they know won't make it to FF - still these features get approved for the release. I suggest to adopt a spec review phase, which would become part of the planning phase, Here is the process (which is similar to some of the openstack projects' process): 1. For each feature the owner would have to submit a spec file which includes a description and details of the feature (like what feature pages should include today - and mostly do not!). An example would be - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-sp... 2. The specs are getting reviews and hopefully approved after they meet some standards and make sense to add to oVirt. 3. Once a spec is approved it can be a candidate to include in the release ( at this point the owner should have a good estimation on how long it is going to take him to implement the proposed spec) 4. The release manager of the version should approve the spec for the version according to the well known deadlines. Livnat