1:24 p.m.
Not everybody will get sources from git. When distributed as tarball this
info is lost.
It is thus always good to be able to reconstruct from the file contents
itself.
Jan
--
Jan H Wildeboer |
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C | Fax: +49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn |
_____________________________________________________________________
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH,
Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15
85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham,
Charles Cachera
_____________________________________________________________________
GPG Key: 3AC3C8AB
Fingerprint: 3D1E C4E0 DD67 E16D E47A 9564 A72F 5C39 3AC3 C8AB
----- Original Message -----
From: board-bounces(a)ovirt.org <board-bounces(a)ovirt.org>
To: cctrieloff(a)redhat.com <cctrieloff(a)redhat.com>
Cc: board(a)ovirt.org <board(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Sat Oct 22 13:18:28 2011
Subject: Re: Policy for applying copyright notices
On 10/19/2011 02:12 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 10/18/2011 05:31 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:41:04PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> > On 10/18/2011 12:35 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >I would like to add to the site some text around applying the
>>> > >copyright
>>> > >statement per the license text as per
>>> > >http://www.ovirt.org/about/licensing/
>>> > >
>>> > >In the piece at the top of the license, there is a section
>>> > >
>>> > >"Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]"
>> >
>> > This will remain a recommendation, right? It would be difficult for
>> > us to get approval to use something other than the IBM corporate
>> > standard copyright notice (which does change every couple years).
>> > It seems (C) comes in and out of style over time :-)
> That line is actually from the appendix of the Apache License 2.0,
> which gives a recommended copyright notice.
>
> I'm sympathetic to the view that precise formal details of copyright
> notices should not be mandated. At Red Hat, I think the "(C)" may have
> been historically recommended, but I have non-actively promoted
> non-use of it on principles of minimalism :-).
>
> I think, however, that Carl was suggesting a rule that *some* suitable
> form of copyright notice be placed by the author of an original file,
> not mandating what the form would be.
correct.
Carl.
I personally rather dropping the [name of copyright owner] I believe
that's why we have history in the source control.
There is one person adding the file and other X (X likely > 1) people
changing it, I see no reason crediting the one who added the file.
We had a discussion on this in the engine-core project some time ago and
we decided to remove all credits to file creators.
If not accepted as a general rule for all oVirt projects I would like to
suggest that this can be decided/changed on a project level.
Livnat
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
4811
days inactive
4811
days old
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jan Wildeboer