Even worse, stripping (c) notes is illegal in many jurisdictions.
Years ago it was eactly what someone did to one of my projects (osCommerce)
and I succesfully sued them in a german court. It was one of the first cases
of GPL in court, BTW and the offender had to restore all original copyrigt
notices.
#justsayin
Jan
--
Jan H Wildeboer |
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C | Fax: +49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn |
_____________________________________________________________________
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH,
Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15
85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham,
Charles Cachera
_____________________________________________________________________
GPG Key: 3AC3C8AB
Fingerprint: 3D1E C4E0 DD67 E16D E47A 9564 A72F 5C39 3AC3 C8AB
----- Original Message -----
From: board-bounces(a)ovirt.org <board-bounces(a)ovirt.org>
To: Livnat Peer <lpeer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: board(a)ovirt.org <board(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Sun Oct 23 09:37:48 2011
Subject: Re: Policy for applying copyright notices
On 10/22/2011 01:18 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
I personally rather dropping the [name of copyright owner] I believe
that's why we have history in the source control.
That is also fine.
Note that if a file is brought to the project it is considered bad form
to strip the copyright notice, so over time we will get a collection of
files with notices and without over time if code is re-used from other
OSS projects.
Carl.
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board