Re: libvirt or ovirt

Hi, =20 On 02/12/2013 12:18 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > Benefits of ovirt: > - Eating our own dogfood > - Scales beter when we want to have multiple nodes / HA features > - Has an extensive API =20 I'm in favour of using oVirt. One of the things that I liked about=20 AlterWay's offer was the idea of running oVirt project infrastructure on=

oVirt managed VMs. =20 There are two choices inside the oVirt decision: do we want a separate=

oVirt manager, or are we happy having the host managed as a node in=20 AlterWay's oVirt managed infrastructure? I personally am fine with using=

AlterWay's management console for the VMs and the host.

> So libvirt would be a better choice if we want to set up fast, but may > limit us in the longer run. Also may use fewer resources, but in the > long run ovirt may allows us to build a bit of monitoring on top of the > API. =20 Using AlterWay's oVirt set-up negates the argument about it being longer=

to set up too - everything is ready to go right now. =20 Cheers, Dave. =20

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRGhPeAAoJEC9+uOgSHVGUh+YP/1apVnXDSHxoBlcsuexRRPpM khff4KR/312drMd2vbxS+M9GmVIwReuAO1lMGGeoaZGTULs+Mnlo+6k2D6LlR7Si y7cuMIE1mt2Wi+5RhFDl8O/rQpU076/rR86NOORPH5pTmjG8VziPzoP1x/8bekt6 o/0kXrxu2JX72tSfWz8QpIlAZ5HRaH/rZbtUnUwK+gmxDc/cex66CJNe0HKDDQFU d0xjPkTxi/sdIxX29EdGsuOPzQ8LJgUaDuuiobDNJu0DNpu+QNdcYrqZ92k/VMbG HPj39H8kfYL902ckM5DU2fkLqn+e9U6Vbr6A4mr06pVLFdUj2DtOw0Nk64ITfLKI RkPRihh5sM6rDy+rEmiB4AeD/aeOPbZjczthMFb726z6lnzQbSwj71ZZI8JLzxC2 EL27o0IgzD2OYjRwJ0Ym3QeA2QlMyf5kZeSjB5H3d3Lva8J/b7NtQwl1iTCYB64c VCT/Gjyhw5RgzGXmo7flfPwFKPIPowHxLKr8GdNfAoDSO2zwJkMMtfTR8JVf6KZj c2PDrGihfjj/dK1ENoaAz0OxLOYPcgSMBG+EceuEza1qsX23mSiGeu/NZVXx7RUI l3h/N7MgvUpEuYhjqIN9p2ySCEMo64dijdpwDVzpmPltfpiWo83iVdXaPhIdFkv0 +z36HvgSCoAYwQqGDylr =PNg1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----