Re: Another cpopen missing failure
update: i tested this with new python-cpopen and it seems to work.
so i guess we should push the new version into fedora and el soon to resolve this.
Eyal.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>
To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, "Sandro Bonazzola"
<sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>, "Kiril Nesenko"
<knesenko(a)redhat.com>
Cc: infra(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 5:29:29 PM
Subject: Re: Another cpopen missing failure
ok,
sandro - can we update the ovirt-testing repo with the latest pkg?
or remove the offending one?
eyal.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>,
> infra(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:50:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Another cpopen missing failure
>
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:10:54PM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > the problem is that one vdsm jobs needs python-cpopen (like unit tests),
> > while another job (like vdsm install sanity) fails on it cause of
> > conflict
> > with vdsm-python-cpopen,
> > so puppet does what it should like all other pkg.
> >
> > what's wrong is:
> > 1. why vdsm still builds vdsm-python-cpopen if it's not needed
>
> ovirt-3.3's Vdsm builds vdsm-python-cpopen - as it always has and always
> will. We cannot change history, and we shouldn't make such a change in a
> stable branch.
>
> master's Vdsm does not build that package and does not require it.
>
> > 2. why spec file brings it when you try to install python-cpopen.
>
> http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/updates-testing/rpm/Fedora/19/x86_64/
> is enabled on that slave, and it carries
> vdsm-python-4.13.2-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm which provides python-cpopen=1.2.3
>
> Yum prefers to take it over the available version from fedora. This
> might be related to the fact that
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23216/python-cpopen-1...
> is stuck in testing mode for quite some time. Your karma may hasten
> things there.
>
> I share Ewoud's opinion: since some jobs need python-cpopen and some
> conflict with it, it should not be part of the platform handled by
> puppet, but job-specific.
>
> On the mean while we should disable the updates-testing repo, or drop
> the old ovirt-3.3 stuff from it, or put python-cpopen-1.2.3-5 there.
>
> Dan.
>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra