Re: Puppet proposal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade"
<kwade(a)redhat.com>
To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:24:09 PM
Subject: Re: Puppet proposal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2012 03:25 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
> i have a deamon i've written already - attached.
Do we have a git repo for the Infra team yet? I know we could have
Puppet manifests in its own repo, but we have other version control
needs. Maybe one repo?
i recommend one repo for puppet classes. ('puppet')
we can publish it to community also, so people can contribute puppet classes we well.
i still think we need a separate 'jenkins' repo for all jenkins code, for personal
exp using complex jenkins code in jobs.
but i won't object to have a single repo for starts with subdirectories (/jenkins
/puppet /foreman)
E.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFQKl+J2ZIOBq0ODEERArmdAKCH4ro2WnKzyFu+TX6g8zlIdn5xWQCgxfVF
5KbY33AL3uVuGOJqQLlUdSc=
=2cy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra