Re: Minutes :: Infra weekly sync :: 20121126

On 11/27/2012 04:29 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: >> On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: >>>>> i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which >>>>> repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize >>>>> for me name of repos and maintainers for each. >>> We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think? >>> >>> At the least, I think we need: >>> >>> web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks > > I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web. infra-website sounds good to me - combine the suggestions. :) > >>> For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git >>> before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe >>> we need a source control for that anyway? > > I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need > those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files > in our scripts repo or something. infra-puppet? Right, so all scripts Puppet is going to run come from infra-puppet. We can make a yum repo of RPMs later, if needed. Is that correct? >>> infra_scripts: (all of Infra team) > > How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more > consistent with other repositories that also use a dash. Nope, you are correct - infra-scripts is better. Anything else we're missing here? For maintainers: infra-website Mike Burns Eyal Edri Itamar Heim Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden Robert Middleswarth Ofer Schreiber Karsten Wade Dave Neary Garrett Lesage Jason Brooks infra-scripts Mike Burns Eyal Edri Itamar Heim Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden Robert Middleswarth Ofer Schreiber Karsten Wade infra-puppet Mike Burns Eyal Edri Itamar Heim Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden Robert Middleswarth Ofer Schreiber Karsten Wade