On 11 July 2016 at 23:12, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357
Francesco, shouldn't vdsm require virtlogd explicitly?
This is unrelated to this thread.
The discussion here is about configuration on Lago hosts, they are not
running vdsm...
--
Barak Korren
bkorren(a)redhat.com
RHEV-CI Team