On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize for me name of repos and maintainers for each. We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think?
At the least, I think we need:
web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks
I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web.
For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe we need a source control for that anyway?
I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files in our scripts repo or something.
infra_scripts: (all of Infra team)
How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more consistent with other repositories that also use a dash.
are these the final names?
Almost ;)