On 28 March 2017 at 14:21, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just noticed we have couple of different places for the same kind of
>> content (packages):
>>
>> /pub/ - includes new releases and snapshots repos
>>
>
> This is the official place for oVirt releases and what any user should
> use.
> The official repositories
>
>
>> /repos/ovirt/{experimental,tested}/ - experimental seems pretty close
>> to snapshots
>>
>
> Experimental - internal repo for CI, no one should use it.
> Tested - official verified repos with packages that passed OST, we
> recommend anyone to use that repo if he wants latest and greatest packages
> and can't wait to an official release
>
If it's now official, please move it to /pub. /repos is not meant to be
used for official public content. /repos was meant to host internal,
development, temporary, backup repos.
I guess the description Eyal gave was misleading. The "official" cutting
edge releases were and remain in the nightly "snapshot" repos under
"/pub".
"tested" is for use by processes that cannot wait for the nightly
publishing job and needs the latest stuff that passed OST (This means most
CI processes, but probably not user processes).
--
Barak Korren
bkorren(a)redhat.com
RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
https://ifireball.wordpress.com/