[URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] ovirt-node-iso_master_merged vs ovirt-node_master_create-iso_merged

Hi, comparing 3.4 publisher with master publisher I see: for master: Copied 3 artifacts from "ovirt-node-iso_master_merged" for 3.4: Copied 11 artifacts from "ovirt-node_master_create-iso_merged" Supposing both jobs should take sources from master I think that either both or only one of them should be collected by both 3.4 and master publishers. If the assumption on the source is wrong we've a naming issue here. Can you look into this? Thanks. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com