Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???
Hello All.
Based on the forwarded message and DNS checks I did everything should be
fine. The only thing is that have CNAME for mail server may not be a good
idea and it is better to make lists to be A and AAAA direct records,
reverses are already fine. As I see that's the plan so looks good. When we
change we can check headers of the nearest message after DSN propagation
and google and see if it treats it as SPF pass.
Anton.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) <duck(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Quack,
Thanks dneary for coming to this thread.
On 05/25/2016 04:24 AM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> How about experimenting and see what happens (SCIENCE!), maybe with a
> warning to the two main lists (devel, users) in case anything breaks?
I'm in favor of experimenting too.
I see no reason not to have IPv6 working on the machines' services after
a look at the configurations. The IPv6 reverse is good, we/I only have
to re-add the direct AAAA and reenable Postfix IPv6, and watch :-).
I will to that tomorrow unless someone raise concerns.
Regards.
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
Anton Marchukov
Senior Software Engineer - RHEV CI - Red Hat
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.1 KB)