On 03/14/2013 09:48 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/14/2013 03:44 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have.
>>> will give a few days to see if any special comments from others.
>>
>> Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under the sdk repo
that already exists. IOW, have a single sdk srpm the generates ruby, java, python, etc
bindings?
>
> this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains
> python bindings, not sure if someone seeking for
> the python sources need to get java/ruby/etc, as well.
>
> having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc bindings,
> not related to physical bindings repositories i guess,
>
> the question is do we want to have different bindings under same
> place, - this is not that common afaik.
actually now when i'm thinking about this, gerrit works peer git repo/project,
so sending different sources to the single repo ovirt-engine-sdk will be confusing,
i.e people that would like to 'watch' sdk-java changes would not be able to
differentiate
them from the sdk-python/ruby/etc commits.
Fair point. I'm fine with a separate repo.
+1
>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Infra mailing list
>>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
>
>