Re: Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade"
<kwade(a)redhat.com>
To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:56:00 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval
On 11/26/2012 07:51 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Doron,
>
> On 11/26/2012 04:41 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>> I've been getting this too much lately...
>>
>> Currently I'm having a discussion with ~9 people.
>> Is this reason really needed?
>> If so, can we increase the # to something reasonable? Let's say
>> 20?
>
> May I ask, is everyone in the discussion registered for the list?
> If so,
> perhaps you can avoid including them all in the "To:" or "CC:"
> lines?
>
> 20 people CCed is a lot for a mailing list. 10 sounds much more
> reasonable to me.
>
> We can also change the mailing list rules to remove members of the
> list
> from the CC list of emails you get - this should ensure that only
> people
> who are not subscribed to the list stay CCed.
Dave, that's a good question, which I thought of before writing my initial mail.
The simple answer is: "I don't know for sure". Actually is there a way for
me to list
the members of a specific list?
I know there are many users in subscribed to relevant lists (for vdsm, infra, etc), but
removing one or more from a thread can actually become an insult. So as a habit I really
prefer to avoid it.
I really hope that 10 recipients along with mailman removing redundancy
will do the trick.
Ooh, I didn't know Mailman would do that, that's a great
idea. (I
always
like to remove all the extra recipients, but sometimes you don't know
who is on the list or not.)
+20
What setting is that?
- Karsten
--
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41