-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Speak up if you disagree, but we could sure use a task tracker for the
Infra team.
One idea Mike suggested is, this Trac instance is gathering dust and
available to take over (and re-customize):
https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt
We could start using this immediately, and switch in the future. It is
Trac, I've had varied experience with it; I know how to admin it
fairly well, and we can customize it to this team with minimal effort.
(Nice to not have to invest too much in making a workflow.) My biggest
concern right now would be running at a larger scale - what happens
over time? What happens if other project teams want an integrated task
tracker? (The latter would make project management and getting an
organized release out the door easier.)
I looked around at the current state of FOSS tools that are offered as
a service, and didn't get too excited.
http://www.hostedredmine.com/
https://ovirt-infra.teamlab.com
I've also looked at
teambox.com in the past, but their no-cost
services are limited. (They also haven't released any timeline or
roadmap about open sourcing the latest version, the older versions are
FOSS; I haven't looked at what it would take to run the service
ourselves.)
There are several services that are FOSS and we could run ourselves,
such as the above Trac and Redmine.
I strongly urge us to avoid using services that are not FOSS. There
are many competitive ones in the proprietary markets, and a few offer
no-cost usage for open source projects. I get concerned about locking
our data and workflows in to a particular vendor. I would rather pick
the best-of FOSS and be a strong user to support more development on
our choice. Unfortunately, this does limit our choices in what is
offered as a service.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .....
http://iquaid.org ..... gpg key: AD0E0C41
http://Fairy-TaleFarm.com .......................... Urban homestead
http://MicahForCouncil.org ................ Your advocate on council
http://SantaCruzPedicab.com .......... Sensible local transportation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFQQR+42ZIOBq0ODEERArIbAKCN/uF+rlc9oH7tq4JoGtiDVeeCCQCgtGbW
yJUUOowWAbcH1Z1K8LnLkFs=
=/muc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra I am not really a fan of all of the
above. Most of the hosted sites are
going to limit you because they want to encourage you to pay so I think
something hosted on a VPS or something we can move the data to another
host if we need to. With that said the most import aspect of any system
we chose is that at least 1 trusted person on the infra team knows it
pretty well because there is nothing worse then learning a system when
it is down or you are under the gun.
--
Thanks
Robert Middleswarth
@rmiddle (twitter/Freenode IRC)
@RobertM (OFTC IRC)