(Replying as the one who came up with the original name)
Not sure current name is that good, but imo we should not rename - main
reason is that we might eventually add upstream support one day, and it
will then be ugly if we now rename.
I do not think it causes that much confusion - does it? We do not package
for upstream, so whoever that looks at it upstream must do this by first
looking at the source. Perhaps we should patch README to clarify that it
currently only supports RHV, and that patches for oVirt are welcome :-)
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 7:59 AM, eyal edri (oVirt JIRA) <
jira(a)ovirt-jira.atlassian.net> wrote:
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2058?page=com.atlassian.jir...
]
eyal edri commented on OVIRT-2058:
I'm not sure it's a good idea to name upstream project rhvm just for
consistency, there are other projects which have this diff between upstream
and downstream.
Maybe you meant ovirt-fast-forward-upgrade?
Also, I'm not sure it's possible to rename a git repo, we probably need to
create new one and repush all content.
On Fri, May 25, 2018, 19:16 Douglas Landgraf (oVirt JIRA) <
rename project: ovirt-engine-hyper-upgrade to rhvm-fast-forward-upgrade
Key: OVIRT-2058
URL:
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2058
Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
Issue Type: By-EMAIL
Reporter: Douglas Landgraf
Assignee: infra
Hi, Please rename project ovirt-engine-hyper-upgrade to
rhvm-fast-forward-upgrade in gerrit and related components. Reason: project
name consistency Thanks! — Cheers Douglas
— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100086)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list -- infra(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave(a)ovirt.org
--
Didi