On 03/14/2013 09:44 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>>
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>
>> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have. will give a few
>> days to see if any special comments from others.
>
> Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under
> the sdk repo that already exists. IOW, have a single sdk srpm the
> generates ruby, java, python, etc bindings?
this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains python
bindings, not sure if someone seeking for the python sources need to
get java/ruby/etc, as well.
having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc
bindings, not related to physical bindings repositories i guess,
the question is do we want to have different bindings under same
place, - this is not that common afaik.
Not a single rpm, a single srpm with multiple subpackages for -python
-java, -ruby.
I had looked at libvirt, and they ship python bindings from the libvirt
srpm. Further looks shows a number of other packages like ocaml-libvirt
that aren't. Seems like it could go either way.
/me doesn't object either way.
Mike
>> _______________________________________________ Infra mailing
>> list Infra(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>