On 03/14/2013 09:44 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
thanks.
+1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have. will give a few days to see if any special comments from others.
Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under the sdk repo that already exists. IOW, have a single sdk srpm the generates ruby, java, python, etc bindings?
this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains python bindings, not sure if someone seeking for the python sources need to get java/ruby/etc, as well.
having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc bindings, not related to physical bindings repositories i guess,
the question is do we want to have different bindings under same place, - this is not that common afaik.
Not a single rpm, a single srpm with multiple subpackages for -python -java, -ruby. I had looked at libvirt, and they ship python bindings from the libvirt srpm. Further looks shows a number of other packages like ocaml-libvirt that aren't. Seems like it could go either way. /me doesn't object either way. Mike
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra