OK, thanks for the clarification.
We'll add the missing permission. any other permissions
master-branch-maintainers should have on stable branch?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
That was always the case, master maintainers should have +2 on the
stable
branches without merge rights, this helps me distinguished between:
1. Who is actually a maintainer from the ones acking the patch
2. If a maintainer meant we're good to go or gave his review yet would
like another reviewer to have a look
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I wasn't aware we were allowing +2 permissions without merge rights on
> stable branch,
> If this should be supported then we need to update the permissions, so
> all master branch maintainers need +2 (w/o merge) to stable branches?
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Master
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> stable branch maintainers or master branch maintainers?
>>>
>>> On Dec 20, 2016 4:40 PM, "Tal Nisan" <tnisan(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Heard it from a couple of guys, yesterday it appeared to be working
>>>> fine, today it's not
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Infra mailing list
>>>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eyal Edri
> Associate Manager
> RHV DevOps
> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> Red Hat Israel
>
> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>
--
Eyal Edri
Associate Manager
RHV DevOps
EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Red Hat Israel
phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)