11:05 a.m.
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Roman Mohr <rmohr(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Nice,
>> So its an online hosted Sonar instance for open source projects?
>>
>
> Exactly.
>
>
>> What about other projects in oVirt like VDSM?
>>
>
> We can ask them. Don't see any problems there.
> I would just start with the engine and see how the whole process works.
>
On one hand Engine would be nice because we can compare it to Coverity.
On the other hand, I'd start with VDSM, as we don't have today something
for it - and it's a smaller project.
I have not much experience with sonar and python. Further I don't know if
travis support is already don for VDSM. There was a thread a few weeks ago
regarding this topic.
Doing it with the engine will be very very easy for me. I can just do it
while I work on other stuff ;)
Y.
>
>
>> E.
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:13 AM, David Caro Estevez <dcaro(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/05 09:13, David Caro Estevez wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hey Roman,
>>> >
>>> > Adding the infra list
>>>
>>> Forgot to add them XP
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On 05/05 08:57, Roman Mohr wrote:
>>> > > Hi David,
>>> > >
>>> > > I have asked sonarqube if they would add ovirt-engine to
>>> > > https://nemo.sonarqube.org/.
>>> > >
>>> > > sonarqube is a pretty nice tool for source code analysis. It has a
>>> slightly
>>> > > different focus than coverity and could be very useful for us.
>>> >
>>> > Have you discussed this with the ovirt-engine maintainers/devs? Not
>>> that I
>>> > think it would be an issue, but usually people don't like surprises
:)
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > They are happy to add us. In the past they just built everything
on
>>> nemo
>>> > > and published the results but they are switching to building on
>>> travis and
>>> > > just upload the results.
>>> > >
>>> > > Do you think you could give me access to our ovirt-engine github
>>> repo?
>>> >
>>> > I can add the project, no problem, you can just make sure to create
>>> the new
>>> > branch with the travis yaml (if noone has issues with it).
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > I would do the following:
>>> > > - prepare a .travis.yml file on a separate branch
>>> > > - configure an account on nemo with the help of a sonarqube guy
>>> >
>>> > ^ the accounts are free? Can we create a project and add multiple
>>> admin
>>> > accounts? If not, we should find a way to share that account to avoid
>>> a single
>>> > maintainer
>>> >
>>> > > - enable travis builds
>>> > > - when everything works I would add the .travis.yml file through
a
>>> normal
>>> > > gerrit patch
>>> > > - give up my github permissions if required ;)
>>> > >
>>> > > Roman
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > David Caro
>>> >
>>> > Red Hat S.L.
>>> > Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>>> >
>>> > Tel.: +420 532 294 605
>>> > Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
>>> > IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
>>> > Web: www.redhat.com
>>> > RHT Global #: 82-62605
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Caro
>>>
>>> Red Hat S.L.
>>> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>>>
>>> Tel.: +420 532 294 605
>>> Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
>>> IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
>>> Web: www.redhat.com
>>> RHT Global #: 82-62605
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Infra mailing list
>>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eyal Edri
>> Associate Manager
>> RHEV DevOps
>> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>> Red Hat Israel
>>
>> phone: +972-9-7692018
>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>
>
>