I vote for <non_descriptive_name_of_function> as a hostname, first of all. But to keep with the theme of what we have, I vote for engine01 or manager01 or whatever. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden < ewoud+ovirt@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:05:07AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
I'm guessing we'd want to give the instance a proper fqdn -> "manager01.ovirt.org", "engine.ovirt.org" ?
I dislike those options. manager01 (to me) implies a cluster where each managerXX is a node. engine implies there is only one which won't be true since we'll set up another engine at rackspace. I'd prefer to have one, but as far as I know this is currently not possible (and maybe due to latency even a bad idea).
How about engine.alterway.ovirt.org, engine-alterway.ovirt.org or alterway-engine.ovirt.org? _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- /Alexander Rydekull