On 01/16/2014 12:37 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Caro" <dcaroest@redhat.com> To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo@redhat.com> Cc: "arch" <arch@ovirt.org>, "infra" <infra@ovirt.org>, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:18:41 PM Subject: Re: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch
El jue 16 ene 2014 11:15:52 CET, Sandro Bonazzola escribió:
Il 16/01/2014 11:12, Alon Bar-Lev ha scritto:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo@redhat.com> To: "infra" <infra@ovirt.org>, "arch" <arch@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:09:46 PM Subject: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch
Hi, since it seems not possible to have both master and 3.4 nightly builds, I suggest to move nightly to 3.4 branches. At this stage nobody really needs master nightly, while 3.4.0 branches nightly will be more useful.
Why is that?
Kiril is working on splitting repo per version, so you have multiple nightly.
nightly requires 6GB of disk space and we have just 3GB left there. We're short on resources for having multiple nightlies right now.
I correct myself, right now nightly takes ~3GB of space. I can try to make some space, but if the repo size increases a little we'll run out f space there.
if nobody will test master then we will be in big problem when trying to stabilize it.
agree - we need master tested and we should have nightlies on it as well
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
-- David Caro
Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Email: dcaro@redhat.com Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605
_______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch