Re: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master - Build # 2046 - Failure!

Adding Ales as well. AFAIK vdsm does not actively poll engine for liveness, nor does any retries. But retries might be at a deeper infra level where Marcin is the person to ask IIUC.

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:40 PM Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:30 PM Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:02 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Il giorno mer 23 giu 2021 alle ore 07:48 Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; ha scritto: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:13 PM Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:01 AM Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:08 AM <jenkins(a)jenkins.phx.ovirt.org&gt; wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Project: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/ > >>> > > > Build: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/2046/ > >>> > > > Build Number: 2046 > >>> > > > Build Status: Failure > >>> > > > Triggered By: Started by timer > >>> > > > > >>> > > > ------------------------------------- > >>> > > > Changes Since Last Success: > >>> > > > ------------------------------------- > >>> > > > Changes for Build #2046 > >>> > > > [Eitan Raviv] network: force select spm - wait for dc status > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > ----------------- > >>> > > > Failed Tests: > >>> > > > ----------------- > >>> > > > 1 tests failed. > >>> > > > FAILED: he-basic-suite-master.test-scenarios.test_004_basic_sanity.test_template_export > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Error Message: > >>> > > > ovirtsdk4.Error: Failed to read response: [(<pycurl.Curl object at 0x5624fe64d108>, 7, 'Failed to connect to 192.168.200.99 port 443: Connection refused')] > >>> > > > >>> > > - The engine VM went down: > >>> > > > >>> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/20... > >>> > > > >>> > > MainThread::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:34,414::hosted_engine::517::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(_monitoring_loop) > >>> > > Current state EngineUp (score: 3400) > >>> > > MainThread::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:44,575::states::135::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(score) > >>> > > Penalizing score by 960 due to network status > >>> > > > >>> > > - Because HA monitoring failed to get a reply from the dns server: > >>> > > > >>> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/20... > >>> > > > >>> > > Thread-1::WARNING::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:25,486::network::120::network.Network::(_dns) DNS query failed: > >>> > > ; <<>> DiG 9.11.26-RedHat-9.11.26-4.el8_4 <<>> +tries=1 +time=5 > >>> > > ;; global options: +cmd > >>> > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > >>> > > > >>> > > Thread-3::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:28,543::mem_free::51::mem_free.MemFree::(action) memFree: 1801 > >>> > > Thread-5::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:28,972::engine_health::246::engine_health.EngineHealth::(_result_from_stats) > >>> > > VM is up on this host with healthy engine > >>> > > Thread-2::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:31,532::mgmt_bridge::65::mgmt_bridge.MgmtBridge::(action) Found > >>> > > bridge ovirtmgmt in up state > >>> > > Thread-1::WARNING::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:33,011::network::120::network.Network::(_dns) DNS query failed: > >>> > > ; <<>> DiG 9.11.26-RedHat-9.11.26-4.el8_4 <<>> +tries=1 +time=5 > >>> > > ;; global options: +cmd > >>> > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > >>> > > > >>> > > Thread-4::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:37,433::cpu_load_no_engine::126::cpu_load_no_engine.CpuLoadNoEngine::(calculate_load) > >>> > > System load total=0.3196, engine=0.1724, non-engine=0.1472 > >>> > > Thread-3::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:37,839::mem_free::51::mem_free.MemFree::(action) memFree: 1735 > >>> > > Thread-5::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:39,146::engine_health::246::engine_health.EngineHealth::(_result_from_stats) > >>> > > VM is up on this host with healthy engine > >>> > > Thread-1::WARNING::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:40,535::network::120::network.Network::(_dns) DNS query failed: > >>> > > ; <<>> DiG 9.11.26-RedHat-9.11.26-4.el8_4 <<>> +tries=1 +time=5 > >>> > > ;; global options: +cmd > >>> > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > >>> > > > >>> > > Thread-1::WARNING::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:07:40,535::network::92::network.Network::(action) Failed to verify > >>> > > network status, (2 out of 5) > >>> > > > >>> > > - Not sure why. DNS servers: > >>> > > > >>> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/20... > >>> > > > >>> > > # Generated by NetworkManager > >>> > > search lago.local > >>> > > nameserver 192.168.200.1 > >>> > > nameserver fe80::5054:ff:fe0c:9ad0%ovirtmgmt > >>> > > nameserver fd8f:1391:3a82:200::1 > >>> > >>> Now happened again: > >>> > >>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/17434/ > >>> > >>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/174... > >>> > >>> Thread-1::INFO::2021-06-22 > >>> 18:57:29,134::network::88::network.Network::(action) Successfully > >>> verified network status > >>> ... > >>> > >>> Thread-1::WARNING::2021-06-22 > >>> 18:58:13,390::network::92::network.Network::(action) Failed to verify > >>> network status, (0 out of 5) > >>> Thread-1::INFO::2021-06-22 > >>> 18:58:15,761::network::88::network.Network::(action) Successfully > >>> verified network status > >>> ... > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > - The command we run is 'dig +tries=1 +time=5', which defaults to > >>> > > querying for '.' (the dns root). This is normally cached locally, but > >>> > > has a TTL of 86400, meaning it can be cached for up to one day. So if > >>> > > we ran this query right after it expired, _and_ then the local dns > >>> > > server had some issues forwarding our request (due to external issues, > >>> > > perhaps), then it would fail like this. I am going to ignore this > >>> > > failure for now, assuming it was temporary, but it might be worth > >>> > > opening an RFE on ovirt-hosted-engine-ha asking for some more > >>> > > flexibility - setting the query string or something similar. I think > >>> > > that this bug is probably quite hard to reproduce, because normally, > >>> > > all hosts will use the same dns server, and problems with it will > >>> > > affect all of them similarly. > >>> > > > >>> > > - Anyway, it seems like there were temporary connectivity issues on > >>> > > the network there. A minute later: > >>> > > > >>> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_he-basic-suite-master/20... > >>> > > > >>> > > Thread-1::INFO::2021-06-08 > >>> > > 05:08:08,143::network::88::network.Network::(action) Successfully > >>> > > verified network status > >>> > > > >>> > > But that was too late and the engine VM was already on its way down. > >>> > > > >>> > > A remaining open question is whether we should retry before giving up, > >>> > > and where - in the SDK, in OST code, etc. - or whether this should be > >>> > > considered normal. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >> > >> > >> Question is: is retry in place also on vdsm side? Because if it fails on vdsm, it's better to fail here as well. If there's a retry process in vdsm for all network calls, I think we can relax the check here and retry before giving up. > > > > > > No idea, adding Eitan. > > I talked with Eitan about this in private, and he'll check. Thanks. > > This happened more often recently. > > I pushed a patch [1] to test the network alongside OST, and one of the > CI check-patch runs for it also failed due to this reason [2] (check > broker.log on host-0). The log generated by this patch [3] ends with > "Passed 1311 out of 1338", meaning it lost 27 replies in less than an > hour, which IMO is quite a lot. The latest version of the patch tries > dig with '+tcp' - if that's enough to make it pass with (close to) > zero losses, perhaps we can do the same in HA. > > Thanks and best regards, > > [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/ovirt-system-tests/+/115586 > [2] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/17711/ > [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/177... > -- > Didi >