Re: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch

From: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "arch" <arch(a)ovirt.org&gt;, "infra" <infra(a)ovirt.org&gt;, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:18:41 PM Subject: Re: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch El jue 16 ene 2014 11:15:52 CET, Sandro Bonazzola escribió: > Il 16/01/2014 11:12, Alon Bar-Lev ha scritto: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> To: "infra" <infra(a)ovirt.org&gt;, "arch" <arch(a)ovirt.org&gt; >>> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:09:46 PM >>> Subject: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch >>> >>> Hi, >>> since it seems not possible to have both master and 3.4 nightly builds, I >>> suggest to move nightly to 3.4 branches. >>> At this stage nobody really needs master nightly, while 3.4.0 branches >>> nightly will be more useful. >> >> Why is that? >> >> Kiril is working on splitting repo per version, so you have multiple >> nightly. > > nightly requires 6GB of disk space and we have just 3GB left there. > We're short on resources for having multiple nightlies right now. I correct myself, right now nightly takes ~3GB of space. I can try to make some space, but if the repo size increases a little we'll run out f space there.

> > > >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sandro Bonazzola >>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >>> See how it works at redhat.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arch mailing list >>> Arch(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >>> > > -- David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605