On 03/27/2013 08:46 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 03/26/2013 12:15 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> I think that we should split the nightly between two:
>
> 1. nightly stable - the next z stream candidate. 2. nightly next -
> the next minor candidate.
>
> This will enable user to fetch pre-releases of z streams easily when
> setting up nightly repository. Currently as all going into same
> directory, having nightly repository pulls next minor with all its
> issues.
>
> What do you think?
I have no strong objections other than the fact that I don't think we
should be making so many changes in the released branches that require
constantly updating packages in a nightly. If you think it's necessary,
I don't object, though.
As for the setup, this is more in Eyal and Ofer's domain I think. They
maintain the deployment of rpms from jenkins into the nightlies.
perhaps instead of nightly-stable, how about something like updates-testing?
Mike
Mike
>
> Alon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mike Burns" <mburns(a)redhat.com> To: "infra"
>> <infra(a)ovirt.org> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 3:02:27 PM Subject:
>> releases reorganization
>>
>> With the beta release of 3.2 EL6 rpms, I had to re-organize the
>> releases area a bit. Previously, the stable, beta, and alpha
>> directories were symbolic links to the top level 3.2 or 3.1
>> directories. Because EL6 is part of 3.2, but not considered
>> "stable" yet, I needed a way to handle that. The result:
>>
>> Top level 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, etc directories contain src, iso, rpm,
>> and tools directories. The rpm directory will contain *all*
>> distributions that are available for that release, whether beta,
>> alpha, or stable.
>>
>> releases ├── 3.2 │ ├── iso │ ├── rpm │ │ ├── EL │ │ │
>> └── 6 │ │ │ ├── i686 │ │ │ ├── noarch │ │ │
>> ├── repodata │ │ │ │ └── repomd.xml │ │ │ ├──
>> SRPMS │ │ │ └── x86_64 │ │ └── Fedora │ │ ├──
>> 17 -> ../../../3.1/rpm/Fedora/17 │ │ ├── 18 │ │ │
>> ├── i686 │ │ │ ├── noarch │ │ │ ├── repodata │
>> │ │ │ └── repomd.xml │ │ │ ├── SRPMS │ │
>> │ └── x86_64 │ │ └── 19 -> 18 │ ├── src │ └── tools
>>
>>
>>
>> The beta, alpha, and stable symlinks are now real directories
>> containing symlinks for iso src and tools. The rpm directory
>> contains symlinks to the appropriate stable release for the
>> version.
>>
>> releases └── stable ├── iso -> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/iso ├──
>> rpm │ └── Fedora │ ├── 17 ->
>> /var/www/html/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17 │ └── 18 ->
>> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/rpm/Fedora/18 ├── src ->
>> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/src └── tools ->
>> /var/www/html/releases/3.2/tools
>>
>> releases ├── beta │ ├── iso -> ../3.2/iso │ ├── rpm │ │ ├──
>> EL -> ../../3.2/rpm/EL │ │ └── Fedora -> ../../3.2/rpm/Fedora/
>> │ ├── src -> ../3.2/src │ └── tools -> ../3.2/tools
>>
>>
>> I've made these changes already due to requests from some
>> developers who couldn't find the EL6 rpms under 3.2. If we want to
>> change this model, then let me know. Otherwise, I'll add this
>> documentation to the wiki.
>>
>> Mike _______________________________________________ Infra mailing
>> list Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
> _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>