
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Caro" <dcaro@redhat.com> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer@redhat.com> Cc: "infra" <infra@ovirt.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 6:31:44 PM Subject: Re: [Jenkins] Passing parameters to build-artifacts.sh
On 06/22 19:21, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
This could be done, but not trival to do, and also requires you to know, before merging, that this is the patch you are gonna release.
A differnt but somewhat common practice is to use git tagging and 'git describe' to set the package version. We can make build_artifacts trigger when a tag is pushed, AFAIK Lago already does that...
בתאריך 22 ביוני 2016 18:39, "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs@redhat.com> כתב:
Hi,
I'm just curious whether it's possible to do the following:
Let's say we have a project (ovirt-engine-dashboard) built by Jenkins, which means there's a Jenkins job that runs build-artifacts.sh script whenever a patch gets merged via gerrit.
Can we somehow pass custom parameters to build-artifacts.sh for such (Jenkins CI) builds?
For example, putting something like this into commit message:
My-Param 123
would reflect into `My-Param` env. variable when running the script?
Motivation: for release builds (which shouldn't contain the "snapshot" part [*] in RPM release string), pass parameter to build-artifacts.sh that ensures the "snapshot" part is empty. This way, we don't need to patch the project prior to release (remove "snapshot" in spec) & then patch it again after the release (re-add "snapshot" in spec).
[*] {date}git{commit}
How about adding a flag to the project yaml?
For example:
version: - master: branch: master - 0.16: branch: ioprocess-0.16 release: true
Then run build-artifacts with RELEASE=1 environment variable, so we can tell that this is a release build, and create release friendly rpms?
That's not better than adding a commit to the project for each release imo.
I'd go for the tag thingie actually, just detecting that you are in a tag to control if the extra 'snapshot' should be added or not.
Yes, this sounds like the most correct approach. We'll need to tag anyway :) As mentioned above, it would be really nice if build-artifacts was invoked also when pushing new tag to remote.
Nir _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- David Caro
Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra