Re: vdsm ppc64le support

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> On 25 June 2017 at 09:38, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> בתאריך 23 ביוני 2017 15:56,‏ "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> כתב: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> we dropped publishing vdsm ppc64le builds on snapshot repos due to >>>> issues keeping aligned nvr between x86_64 and ppc64le. >>>> >>>> Today we're still missing ppc64le builds on >>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/ >>>> >>>> Where do we stand with the support for the build of the same nvr ob >>>> both arches? >>>> >>>> Can we get it re-enabled? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. We solved the issues we had with this a while ago with the new >>>> deploy-to-expetimental job. Are you sure the ppc64le builds are not making >>>> it to 'tested'? (Im assuming the builds themselves are enabled...) >>>> >>>> I suppose the situation with 4.1 is a little different because it is >>>> not taking stuff from 'tested' yet... >>>> >>> >>> Sent [1], which should solve it. >>> Barak, the fact that we still publish nightly to 4.1 in the old way can >>> somehow still cause issues for publishing both ppc64le and x86_64? >>> The only thing I can think of is if for a very slim chance, one of the >>> builds of vdsm is running during the time publisher works resulting in a >>> mismatch in the repo, right? >>> >>> >> Yeah, not very probable. >> >> Maybe we should just clean up the publishers and move 4.1 to use >> 'tested' too. Do we have a ticket about that? >> > > https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1477 > > But I don't see a good reason to push it forward unless we hit a problem > or blocker, it might cause issues like we've seen in master and also > there is a good chance 4.1 still has old non-standard CI projects that > will make it impossible to finish, unless we migrate them to standard CI > (which also might not be worth the effort). > > Bottom line, good to have a ticket on it, we'll do if we see its needed > at some point. > Verified we have ppc64le on 4.1-snapshot: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/ BTW, we're still building and publishing qemu-kvm-rhev to 4.1, i'm assuming the latest change to pick it up from kvm-common was for master only?

> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Barak Korren >> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi >> Red Hat EMEA >> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted >> > > > > -- > > Eyal edri > > > ASSOCIATE MANAGER > > RHV DevOps > > EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D > > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> > phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > -- Eyal edri ASSOCIATE MANAGER RHV DevOps EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)