Re: Puppet environment name / branch name

On Thu 21 Nov 2013 03:03:00 PM CET, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/21/2013 03:29 PM, Ohad Basan wrote: >> +1 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl&gt; >>> To: infra(a)ovirt.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:27:39 PM >>> Subject: Puppet environment name / branch name >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just deployed r10k to be the deployment method and it works generally >>> well. One problem is that it maps branches one to one. Currently I >>> worked around this by making a symlink, but I think we should rename our >>> master branch to production. Opinions? > > is that common? usually master is named master. > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > Infra(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra Maybe it's better to change puppet config to use master as the 'production' environment source of manifests. I say that because it's usually a mess to have a branch that it's not the master as master... (@work we use development as master in one of the repos, and I always submit a patch or two a month to master instead xd)