4:33 a.m.
--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 01/14 10:41, Barak Korren wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way to do so from jenknis job without failing the job
> with slave connection error? Most projects I know that use ephemeral
> slaves have to work around it by having a job that starts/creates a
> slave tag and provisions the slave, and removes it at the end, if we
> can skip that extra job level better for us.
>
Maybe we could use [1] or [2] to trigger an external service.
We can use [3] to prevent race conditions. It also opens up a
possibility of a 'garbage collector' job that will shut down and
remove offline slaves (which will cause pool VMs to come back up clean
and re-join Jenkins with the swarm client)
So essentially no, this is what I said I wanted to avoid :/
>
> iirc the puppet manifest for jenkins already has integration with the
> swarm plugin, we can use that instead.
>
Great, I'll look into that.
>
> Can't we just use a reserved range for those machines instead? there's
> no need to remove from foreman, it can work with machines it does not
> provision.
>
Do we have such a range available? I was under the impression I will
have to wrestle it out of our existing range in which Foreman had been
poking holes at random...
We have a small range right now for non-jenkins vms, but it's easy
(maybe not fast, but easy) to get the slaves to free another
range. But we would have to do so anyhow unless we use internal ips or
request a new range.
>
> I'm in favor of using an internal network for the jenkins slaves, if
> they are the ones connecting to the master there's no need for
> externally addressable ips, so no need for public ips, though I recall
> that it was not so easy to set up, better discuss with the hosting
>
I think that even with swarm, eventually its Jenkins itself that will
open connections to the slaves (Swarm plugin afaik is just used to
notify Jenkins about slave existence, after taht it is used just like
a regular slave, with SSH from Jenkins), so you will need external
addresses for slaves as long as Jenkins in not running in PHX.
Afaik the swarm plugin is an extension of the jnlp slave connection
method, and does not allow to change the connection method to ssh, it
uses it's own (or so it seems from the docs, maybe that changed) that
is to connect to the master from the slave.
> Can't you just autoasign a hostgroup on creation on formean
or
> something?
> Quick search throws a plugin that might do the trick:
> https://github.com/GregSutcliffe/foreman_default_hostgroup
>
> +1 on moving any data aside from the hostgroup assignation to hiera
> though, so it can be versioned and peer reviewed.
>
I kinda prefer to move foreman out of the provisioning process here,
I'm burned by our bad experience with it.
At it seems to me we are agreed on this.
=20
[1]: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Notification+Plugin
[2]: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/zmq-event-publisher/tr=
ee/README
[3]:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Single+Use+Slave+Plugin
=20
=20
--=20
Barak Korren
bkorren(a)redhat.com
RHEV-CI Team
--=20
David Caro
Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWl2t0AAoJEEBxx+HSYmnDLZQIAIQAVjZuXwp+gnuF44s+9pIO
jwREVnLDgxHk8yIy4rflGUNT7KfIKKpWpCtmbeifiy2U3AojZEyKf91vQSPPjWo5
ANHTw0cL3ubvB/q55w/qRUwfpveoJ4OGX55VfVmk6KFauwhSrTjddBLXw56HfIjG
+HPKgDEqrtgXafrX9H37KXmpLUWznzcUeOxLZmbrWWpVKdzQer3LXxe42vTERSSk
O4D8fSAyH/9W5LoOf0IrPPQNyVwI11blBLgdft0CxBygXRYaXyAIhw3t/5IJFguT
RtZ87iWQq+LDxrmc5HQT1owYZLzpXC6GMwEg435WZFivTwfjhB1+2mBc+oGvq0k=
=cOFd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes--