On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:07:21AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
Karsten 'quiad' Wade wrote:
One question is, are we running plain KVM or will we try an oVirt setup on any of these?
I'd say let's eat our dogfood (but only stable one :) Let's decide on the most stable oVirt version we have till now and use it to manage it. It will show the community we have confidence in the product and will surely be easier to manage with webadmin rather than virsh/kvm.
While I haven't actually tried oVirt on a single system, it feels like quite some overhead. But dogfooding is good and I do see benefits in the API. Let's look ahead and suppose we get more physical machines but in different datacenters; could we use the same oVirt to manage those phyiscal machines and would we want to? If so that's a huge plus for oVirt.
and it'll give us a chance to integration foreman with ovirt and jenkins :)
+1 on this integration (though plain libvirt gives us quite some as well).